Hanh Thi My Do v. Arch Insurance Company; Does, 1-20

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HANH THI MY DO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES,
1-20,
Defendants-Appellees,
v.
TWIN TOWN TREATMENT CENTERS
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY YORK
RISK SERVICES GROUP PMA
COMPANIES; et al.,
Cross-defendants-Appellees.
No. 22-55860
D.C. No. 8:20-cv-02105-SPG-ADS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Sherilyn Peace Garnett, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 15, 2023**
Before: TASHIMA, S.R. THOMAS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 30 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 22-55860
Hahn Thi My Do appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment
in her action alleging discrimination in connection with settlement offers following
an automobile collision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In her opening briefs, Do fails to address the district court’s summary
judgment orders and has therefore waived her challenge to the district court’s
summary judgment. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929
(9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued
in appellant’s opening brief.”); Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir.
1993) (issues not supported by argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are
waived).
All pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --