The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-56414•Terence B. Tekoh v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DENNIS STANGELAND, Sergeant; CARLOS VEGA, Deputy
18-56414Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 4, 2023
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TERENCE B. TEKOH,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DENNIS
STANGELAND, Sergeant; CARLOS
VEGA, Deputy,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT; DOES, 1 to 10,
Defendants.
No. 18-56414
D.C. No.
2:16-cv-07297-GW-SK
Central District of California,
Los Angeles
ORDER
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and WARDLAW and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Appellees’ motion to file a reply to Appellant’s response to the petition for
panel rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt. 85) is DENIED.
Pursuant to Circuit Rule 36-2(f), the memorandum disposition filed May 11,
2023, (Dkt. 78) is designated for publication. The superseding published
disposition is filed concurrently with this order. Because the text of the published
disposition remains unchanged from the previously filed memorandum disposition,
further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will not be permitted.
FILED
AUG 4 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Appellees’ already-filed petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt. 82)
remains pending.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.