Charles Randall Sorensen v. EDWARD H. BASTIAN, CEO for Delta Airlines

22-15320Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJul 10, 2023

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES RANDALL SORENSEN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EDWARD H. BASTIAN, CEO for Delta
Airlines; DELTA FAMILY CARE
RETIREMENT, Trust, Also named as
Delta F-Care Retirement,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 22-15320
D.C. No. 3:21-cv-08121-JJT
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 6, 2023**
Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Charles Sorensen appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his action
challenging the defendants’ compliance with an Internal Revenue Service Notice
FILED
JUL 10 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

of Levy. We review de novo, Lopez-Valenzuela v. Arpaio, 770 F.3d 772, 777 (9th
Cir. 2014) (en banc), and affirm.
The district court correctly held that the defendants were not in default
because they filed a timely Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the amended
complaint, instead of filing an answer. The timely Rule 12(b)(6) motion extended
the deadline to answer until after the district court denied the motion. Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12(a)(4)(A). Because the district court granted the motion to dismiss, the
defendants were not required to file an answer.
The district court properly dismissed this action for failure to state a claim.
Sorensen cannot state a claim against the defendants for complying with the Notice
of Levy. See 26 U.S.C. § 6332(e) (providing that a person who “surrenders”
property in compliance with a levy “shall be discharged from any obligation or
liability to the delinquent taxpayer and any other person with respect to such
property or rights to property arising from such surrender or payment.”).
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.