In re: PRAVEEN KEVIN KHURANA v. Department of Health and Welfare, State of Idaho

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: PRAVEEN KEVIN KHURANA,
Debtor,
------------------------------
PRAVEEN KEVIN KHURANA,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
WELFARE, STATE OF IDAHO,
Appellee.
No. 19-60069
BAP No. 18-1196
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Brand, Gan, and Faris, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted December 8, 2022**
Before: WALLACE, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Praveen Kevin Khurana appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 19-60069
Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders in connection
with a state court fraudulent transfer action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 158(d). We affirm.
In his opening brief, Khurana failed to address how the BAP or bankruptcy
court erred and has therefore waived his challenge to the BAP’s judgment or the
bankruptcy court’s orders. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d
925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that “we will not consider any claims that
were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28
F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (noting that “[w]e will not manufacture arguments
for an appellant . . . .”).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --