RUSSELL T. McADAMS v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

20-72611Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSep 22, 2021

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUSSELL T. McADAMS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 20-72611
Tax Ct. No. 19702-19
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from a Decision of the
United States Tax Court
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Russell T. McAdams appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order denying his
post-judgment motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C.
§ 7482(a). We review for an abuse of discretion. Parkinson v. Comm’r, 647 F.2d
875, 876 (9th Cir. 1981). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
SEP 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 20-72611
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying McAdams’s post-
judgment motion for reconsideration because McAdams failed to demonstrate any
basis for such relief. See id. (“The Tax Court’s denial of a motion for
reconsideration will not be overturned on appeal absent a clear abuse of
discretion.”); see also Abatti v. Comm’r, 859 F.2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) (a Tax
Court cannot reopen a case after a final decision except in the event of fraud on the
court or mutual mistake).
We do not consider McAdams’s contentions regarding the Tax Court’s
original decision because McAdams failed to file a timely notice of appeal as to
that decision. See 26 U.S.C. § 7483 (notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days
of judgment); Fed. R. App. P. 13(a)(1)(B); Tax Ct. R. 161, 162 (post-judgment
motions for reconsideration or to vacate or revise a decision must be filed within
30 days of the decision); Nordvik v. Comm’r, 67 F.3d 1489, 1493 n. 5 (9th Cir.
1995) (“[S]uccessive motions asserting the same grounds cannot be tacked
together to extend the time for filing an appeal.”).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.