The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-30090•United States of America v. Dawan Deonte Jones
21-30090Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSep 16, 2021
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAWAN DEONTE JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 21-30090
D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00023-SPW-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Dawan Deonte Jones appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking
supervised release and imposing a 6-month custodial sentence and 51-month term
of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Jones’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
SEP 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 21-30090
with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Jones has filed a pro se
supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
Jones’s pro se request to terminate his supervised release is denied without
prejudice to renewal in the district court at the appropriate time. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3583(e)(1).
Within 7 days of this disposition, appellee must serve the disposition on
appellant individually and provide the court with proof of service, including
appellant’s mailing address.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.