United States v. 2020-08-25 | 17-70742 | RAUL BORBA-CARDOSO V. WILLIAM BARR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL BORGES BORBA-CARDOSO,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 17-70742
Agency No. A030-861-138
MEMORANDUM
*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 5, 2020
**
Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BENCIVENGO,
***
District
Judge.

Raul Borges Borba-Cardoso petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals order of removal. In a concurrently filed opinion, we hold
FILED
AUG 25 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* *
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
* * *
The Honorable Cathy Ann Bencivengo, United States District Judge
for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

that perjury under section 118(a) of the California Penal Code is an “offense
relating to . . . perjury” and is thus an “aggravated felony.” 8
U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S). Borba was convicted under section 118(a), and we
therefore lack jurisdiction over his petition for review. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(C).
PETITION DISMISSED.
2