The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-70816•Salvador Morales-Jasso v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
19-70816Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 26, 2019
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SALVADOR MORALES-JASSO,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 19-70816
Agency No. A030-224-184
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2019**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Salvador Morales-Jasso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion.
Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for
review.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
NOV 26 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 19-70816
The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Morales-Jasso’s untimely
motion to reopen where Morales-Jasso failed to demonstrate changed country
conditions in Mexico to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3); see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90 (new
evidence lacked materiality).
Morales-Jasso’s opposed motion for stay of removal is denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.