The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-16973•MICHAEL GREEN, AKA Kevin Dean Brewer v. Hathaway;
18-16973Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApr 25, 2019
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL GREEN, AKA Kevin Dean
Brewer,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HATHAWAY; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 18-16973
D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01598-MCE-
CKD
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 17, 2019**
Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
California prisoner Michael Green, AKA Kevin Dean Brewer, appeals pro
se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
alleging deliberate indifference to his health and safety. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
APR 25 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 18-16973
Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Green’s action because Green failed to
allege facts sufficient to link defendants to any constitutional violation. See
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (a plaintiff must allege facts that
“allow[] the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for
the misconduct alleged”).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.