Karim Christian Kamal v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, in official capacity; PATRICIA A. BIGELOW, in official capacity

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KARIM CHRISTIAN KAMAL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, in official
capacity; PATRICIA A. BIGELOW, in
official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 18-55759
D.C. No. 2:17-cv-04555-GW-RAO
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 12, 2019**
Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Karim Christian Kamal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAR 19 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-55759
Article III standing. Lopez v. Candaele, 630 F.3d 775, 784-85 (9th Cir. 2010). We
affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Kamal’s action because Kamal failed
to allege facts sufficient to show an injury in fact. See id. at 785 (elements of
Article III standing).
Kamal’s motion to augment the record and to take judicial notice (Docket
Entry No. 9) is denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --