Jose Pablo Ramon-Ricardo v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE PABLO RAMON-RICARDO,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 15-70970
Agency No. A095-619-186
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Immigration Judge
Submitted February 19, 2019**
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Jose Pablo Ramon-Ricardo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a)
that he did not have a reasonable fear of persecution in Mexico and thus is not
entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 21 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-70970
Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition
for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Ramon-Ricardo did
not demonstrate a reasonable possibility of persecution on account of a protected
ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (applicant’s
“desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random
violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --