The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-10167•United States of America v. Rony Gonzalez, a.k.a. Ronni Aguilar- Lopez
18-10167Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJan 22, 2019
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RONY GONZALEZ, a.k.a. Ronni Aguilar-
Lopez,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18-10167
D.C. No. 2:17-cr-01418-JJT
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
John J. Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 15, 2019**
Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Rony Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for transportation of illegal aliens for
profit, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JAN 22 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 18-10167
for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Gonzalez waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our
independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.