United States of America v. Julio Aquil

18-30194Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJan 17, 2019

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JULIO AQUIL,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18-30194
D.C. No. 1:97-cr-00045-SPW-5
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 15, 2019**
Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Julio Aquil appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion
for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Aquil contends that he is eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JAN 17 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-30194
599 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether a district court had
authority to modify a sentence under section 3582(c)(2). See United States v.
Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir. 2009). Amendment 599 provides that when a
defendant has been convicted of both a drug trafficking offense and possession of a
firearm in connection with that drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. §
924(c), a district court should not apply a firearm enhancement in calculating the
guideline range applicable to the underlying drug trafficking offense. The record
shows that the sentencing court did not apply a weapons enhancement when
calculating the Guidelines range for Aquil’s drug trafficking offenses.
Accordingly, Amendment 599 did not have the effect of lowering Aquil’s
guideline range, and the district court correctly concluded that he is ineligible for a
sentence reduction. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B);
Leniear, 574 F.3d at 674.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.