The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-56309•Steve Klein; v. CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH and DOES, 1 through 10
16-56309Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 27, 2018
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVE KLEIN; et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH and DOES, 1
through 10,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-56309
D.C. No.
8:08-cv-01369-JLS-MLG
ORDER*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 6, 2018**
Pasadena, California
Before: W. FLETCHER and OWENS, Circuit Judges***.
Appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition for review, Dkt # 38, is
GRANTED. Accordingly, the memorandum disposition, Klein v. City of Laguna
Beach, 710 F. App’x 766 (9th Cir. 2018) (unpublished), is VACATED.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** Judge Reinhardt was on the original panel. The motion for voluntary
dismissal was voted upon only by Judges Fletcher and Owens.
FILED
AUG 27 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2
The filing of this order shall serve as the court’s mandate.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.