NIKI-ALEXANDER SHETTY, FKA Satish Shetty v. America’s Wholesale Lender;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NIKI-ALEXANDER SHETTY, FKA Satish
Shetty,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER; et
al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-16771
D.C. No. 5:16-cv-05846-NC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 15, 2018**
Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Niki-Alexander Shetty, FKA Satish Shetty, appeals pro se from the
magistrate judge’s order dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims
relating to a mortgage loan on real property transferred to him by the borrowers.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 21 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 17-16771
We review de novo whether the magistrate judge validly entered judgment on
behalf of the district court. Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 501 (9th Cir. 2017).
We vacate and remand.
Shetty and defendants The Bank of New York Mellon, Bayview Loan
Servicing, LLC, and Klinedinst PC consented to proceed before a magistrate judge.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The magistrate judge, however, dismissed claims against
another named defendant in the action, America’s Wholesale Lender, before that
defendant had been served. Because all parties, including unserved defendants,
must consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for jurisdiction to vest,
Williams, 875 F.3d at 503-04, we vacate the magistrate judge’s order and remand
for further proceedings.
The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
VACATED and REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --