The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-10092•United States of America v. Richard Sullivan Benavente
16-10092Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 23, 2017
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RICHARD SULLIVAN BENAVENTE,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10092
D.C. No.
1:13-cr-00008-RVM-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands
Ramona V. Manglona, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2017**
U. of Hawaii Manoa
Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Richard S. Benavente appeals the substantive reasonableness of his prison
sentence for Sexual Exploitation of Children in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a)
and (e), and the application of a two-level sentencing enhancement for obstruction
of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
OCT 23 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2
We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a two-level
sentencing enhancement. See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1169-
70 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The court concluded that Benavente obstructed
justice by making false statements to the government and violating his plea
agreement by testifying falsely at the trial of Raymond Roberto. “[V]iolation of a
plea bargain warrants a sentence enhancement for obstruction of justice.” United
States v. Acuna, 9 F.3d 1442, 1446 (9th Cir. 1993).
Nor was Benavente’s sentence substantively unreasonable. Benavente’s
360-month sentence was within the guidelines range of 292 to 365 months.
Within-guidelines sentences are presumed reasonable. Rita v. United States, 551
U.S. 338, 341 (2007). The court sentenced Benavente to the statutory maximum
after explaining that Benavente had enticed or coerced at least two minor girls into
sexual activity repeatedly in exchange for drugs, and had violated his plea
agreement.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.