The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-10130•United States of America v. ISMAEL MAYA-PIZANO, AKA Ismael Maya Pizano
17-10130Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 17, 2017
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ISMAEL MAYA-PIZANO, AKA Ismael
Maya Pizano,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-10130
D.C. No.
2:16-cr-00121-JAM-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2017**
San Francisco, California
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, and O’MALLEY,*** Circuit
Judges.
FILED
OCT 17 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Kathleen M. O’Malley, United States Circuit Judge for
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
Ismael Maya-Pizano appealed the district court’s sentence prior to our
decision in United States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2017). Maya-
Pizano concedes that Martinez-Lopez forecloses his appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm the sentence.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.