In re: ADINA ZAHARESCU v. Ocwen Financial Services, Inc.;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: ADINA ZAHARESCU,
Debtor.
______________________________
SATISH SHETTY,
Appellant,
v.
OCWEN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; et
al.,
Appellees.
No. 14-55401
D.C. No. 2:13-cv-06569-RGK
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 9, 2017**
Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Satish Shetty appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 24 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 14-55401
bankruptcy court’s order dismissing claims against appellees in Shetty’s adversary
proceeding. We review de novo our own jurisdiction and whether a bankruptcy
court’s decision is final. Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs
(In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir. 2003). We dismiss.
This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because “the bankruptcy
court’s order did not dispose of all of the issues in the adversary proceeding” or
“direct entry of judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) which applies to adversary
proceedings in bankruptcy by virtue of Bankruptcy Rule 7054.” Walther v. King
City Transit Mix, Inc. (In re King City Transit Mix, Inc.), 738 F.2d 1065, 1066-67
(9th Cir. 1984) (appellate jurisdiction in bankruptcy extends only to matters
appealable to the district court as of right).
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --