United States of America v. Adiel Hernandez-Del Cid, a.k.a. Adiel Hernandez

16-10286Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 18, 2017

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ADIEL HERNANDEZ-DEL CID, a.k.a.
Adiel Hernandez,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10286
D.C. No.
2:16-cr-00333-SMM-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 16, 2017**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Adiel Hernandez-Del Cid appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for re-entry of a
removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
FILED
AUG 18 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernandez-Del Cid’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel. We
have provided Hernandez-Del Cid the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Hernandez-Del Cid waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal
waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88
(9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.