AXEL ARNULFO DONIS-ALEGRIA, AKA John Doe, AKA Louis Ramirez v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AXEL ARNULFO DONIS-ALEGRIA,
AKA John Doe, AKA Louis Ramirez,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 15-72106
Agency No. A201-289-313
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 8, 2017**
Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Axel Arnulfo Donis-Alegria, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.
We dismiss the petition for review.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAR 16 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-72106
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Donis-Alegria failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a
qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.
2005). Donis-Alegria’s contention that the agency erred in not conducting a
future-oriented hardship analysis is not supported by the record and does not
amount to a colorable claim that would invoke our jurisdiction. See id. (absent a
colorable constitutional claim or question of law, the court lacks jurisdiction to
review the agency’s discretionary hardship determination).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --