Masoumeh Mohajer v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Company;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MASOUMEH MOHAJER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Company; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-55122
D.C. No. 2:14-cv-03085-DSF-FFM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 14, 2017**
Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Masoumeh Mohajer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims arising from foreclosure
proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 27 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-55122
We do not consider Mohajer’s federal and state law claims arising from
foreclosure proceedings because Mohajer does not challenge the district court’s
dismissal of those claims in her opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d
983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (court does not consider matters not specifically and
distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief).
We reject as unsupported by the record Mohajer’s contention that opposing
counsel filed a proposed order with the district court without a certificate of
service.
Defendants’ September 11, 2015 motion for judicial notice is denied as
unnecessary.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --