Jose Espinoza-Garcia v. JEFF B. SESSIONS, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ESPINOZA-GARCIA,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFF B. SESSIONS, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 15-71865
Agency No. A089-111-692
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 14, 2017**
Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Jose Espinoza-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) final order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 22 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-71865
based on the discretionary determination under the catch-all provision of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1101(f) that Espinoza-Garcia lacked good moral character. See Lopez-
Castellanos v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 848, 854 (9th Cir. 2006); see also Moran v.
Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir. 2005) (good moral character determination
only reviewable if it is based on a per se exclusion category listed in 8 U.S.C.
§ 1101(f)(1)-(9)), overruled on other grounds by Sanchez v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1028
(9th Cir. 2009).
Because the good moral character determination is dispositive, we do not
address Espinoza-Garcia’s contentions regarding the IJ’s credibility finding or his
eligibility for the remaining requirements for cancellation of removal.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --