The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-50250•United States of America v. Candelario Gonzalez-Garcia
14-50250Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 25, 2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CANDELARIO GONZALEZ-GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-50250
D.C. No. 3:14-cr-00021-LAB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 22, 2015**
Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Candelario Gonzalez-Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 78-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We
FILED
AUG 25 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand for
resentencing.
Gonzalez-Garcia argues that the district court erred in denying a minor role
reduction to his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). After Gonzalez-
Garcia was sentenced, the United States Sentencing Commission issued
Amendment 794 (“the Amendment”), which amended the commentary to the
minor role Guideline. The Amendment is retroactive to cases pending on direct
appeal. See United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016).
Among other things, the Amendment added a non-exhaustive list of factors
that a court “should consider” in determining whether to apply a minor role
reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C) (2015). Because we cannot
determine from the record whether the district court considered all of those factors
in determining whether Gonzalez-Garcia was entitled to a minor role adjustment,
we vacate Gonzalez-Garcia’s sentence and remand for resentencing under the
Amendment. See Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d at 523-24.
VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.
14-50250 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.