The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-70594•Jose Arana Olivares v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
15-70594Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 24, 2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ARANA OLIVARES,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 15-70594
Agency No. A092-893-320
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 16, 2016**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Jose Arana Olivares, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
an immigration judge’s order affirming the decision of an asylum officer during
expedited removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Arana Olivares’s removal order because it
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 24 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 15-70594
was issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1), and none of the exceptions to the
restriction on judicial review of expedited removal orders apply. See Pena v.
Lynch, 815 F.3d 452, 455-56 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding court generally lacks
jurisdiction to review removal orders issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1), and
describing the exceptions).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.