The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-17734•Peter Deacon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation
12-17734Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJul 21, 2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETER DEACON, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-17734
D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04674-SBA
ORDER*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 11, 2015
San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and HUCK,** District
Judge.
FILED
JUL 21 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the U.S.
District Court for Southern Florida, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme
Court, which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016.
In view of the Court’s answer, which dispositively resolves this case, the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.