The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-50302•United States of America v. Rebecca Irene Brenes
14-50302Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 13, 2016
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REBECCA IRENE BRENES,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-50302
D.C. No. 3:13-cr-03166-JLS-1
Southern District of California,
San Diego
ORDER
Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed March 31, 2016, is amended as follows:
On page 4, 9th line from the bottom, replace the sentence:
Under that standard, Brenes cannot show that the district court’s
error had “a substantial impact on the jury’s deliberation.”
with:
Under that standard the district court’s error did not have a
“substantial impact on the jury’s deliberation.”
With the foregoing amendment to the memorandum disposition, Defendant-
Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted in this case.
FILED
JUN 13 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.