The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-71977•Huazhong Xu v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
13-71977Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HUAZHONG XU,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-71977
Agency No. A077-163-639
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 9, 2016**
San Francisco, California
Before: KLEINFELD, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Huazhong Xu petitions for review of the decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) vacating the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) grant of
protection under the Convention Against Torture and remanding for further
proceedings.
FILED
MAY 12 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), our review is limited to final orders of removal.
See Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir. 2002). When, as here, “the
BIA remands to the IJ for any reason, no final order of removal exists until all
administrative proceedings have concluded.” Abdisalan v. Holder, 774 F.3d 517,
526 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over Xu’s petition
for review.
PETITION DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.