The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-71967•Jose Jordan Macias-Larios v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
12-71967Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE JORDAN MACIAS-LARIOS,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-71967
Agency No. A095-774-295
ORDER*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 4, 2016**
Seattle, Washington
Before: GRABER and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and BURY,*** Senior District
Judge.
This case is REMANDED for the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") to
"consider, in the first instance, the potential application of the modified categorical
FILED
MAY 06 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable David C. Bury, Senior United States District Judge for
the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
approach, as well as the merits of Petitioner’s request for cancellation" of removal.
Madrigal-Barcenas v. Lynch, 797 F.3d 643, 645 (9th Cir. 2015). Petitioner’s
removal is stayed pending a decision in this matter by the BIA.
The parties shall bear their own attorney fees, costs, and expenses on appeal.
This order shall serve as the mandate of this court.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.