Full text
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLARISSA URIAS INZUNZA, AKA
Clariza Urias-Inzunza,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-72341
Agency No. A205-147-211
ORDER*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 12, 2016**
San Francisco, California
Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Urias Inzunza petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
decision that she was not entitled to a favorable exercise of discretion in
FILED
APR 18 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
connection with her application for cancellation of removal. 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) precludes judicial review of such a determination.
PETITION DISMISSED.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
