Marcos Sanchez-Macias v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

14-71948Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJan 27, 2016

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARCOS SANCHEZ-MACIAS,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-71948
Agency No. A087-744-542
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 20, 2016**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Marcos Sanchez-Macias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) final order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8
U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence findings of fact, Gutierrez v.
FILED
JAN 27 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for
review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Sanchez-
Macias failed to establish the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence in
the United States for cancellation of removal, where his testimony and record
evidence supported the agency’s finding that Sanchez-Macias knowingly and
voluntarily accepted voluntary departure in lieu of removal proceedings in 2009.
See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Gutierrez, 521 F.3d at 1117-18 (acceptance of
voluntary departure terminates physical presence if petitioner understood he had
the right to go before an IJ and chose to depart instead).
In light of this disposition, we need not reach Sanchez-Macias’ remaining
contentions regarding his equities in the United States, his credibility, whether he
demonstrated good moral character, or whether he made a false claim of United
States citizenship.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
14-71948 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.