Li Wang v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LI WANG,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-71163
Agency No. A205-175-733
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 20, 2016**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Li Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her motion to reconsider the denial of her second
FILED
JAN 27 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We dismiss the
petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Wang’s unexhausted contentions regarding
address discrepancies between the address she claims she gave to U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services and the address to which the immigration court mailed
correspondence regarding her case. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th
Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s
administrative proceedings before the BIA.”). To the extent Wang contends the IJ
was biased, we likewise lack jurisdiction to consider that unexhausted contention.
See id.
We deny Wang’s motion to take judicial notice of documents outside the
administrative record. See Lising v. INS, 124 F.3d 996, 998 (9th Cir. 1997)
(explaining standard for review of out-of-record evidence).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
14-71163 2

-- 2 of 2 --