Tracy Webb v. KAISER, (Fremont);

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TRACY WEBB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAISER, (Fremont); et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-15882
D.C. No. 3:13-cv-04654-NC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **
Submitted December 9, 2015 ***
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Tracy Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her
action alleging, among other things, sex and racial discrimination. We review de
novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** Webb consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(c).
*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 17 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 14-15882
failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Brady v. United
States, 211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Webb’s action because Webb failed to
allege facts establishing federal subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,
1332 (requirements for federal subject matter jurisdiction); see also Provincial
Gov’t of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc., 582 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 2009)
(discussing requirements for federal question jurisdiction under § 1331).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --