Renfil Syamsir v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RENFIL SYAMSIR,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-72771
Agency No. A095-630-235
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 9, 2015**
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Renfil Syamsir, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder,
FILED
DEC 15 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Syamsir’s motion to reopen
because it was untimely, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Syamsir failed to
establish materially changed circumstances in Indonesia to qualify for the
regulatory exception to the time limitation for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90 (evidence must be “qualitatively
different” to warrant reopening).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
14-72771 2

-- 2 of 2 --