The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-72100•Santos Marleny Velasquez De Carcamo v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
11-72100Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 15, 2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SANTOS MARLENY VELASQUEZ DE
CARCAMO,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-72100
Agency No. A095-731-944
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 9, 2015**
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Santos Marleny Velasquez de Carcamo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying
her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny
the petition for review.
FILED
DEC 15 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
In her opening brief, Velasquez de Carcamo fails to make any argument that
the BIA abused its discretion in denying her motion to reconsider. See Martinez-
Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir. 1996) (denying the petition for review
where petitioner failed “to address how the BIA abused its discretion by denying
his motion to reopen and reconsider its decision”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
11-72100 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.