The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-10221•United States of America v. Gregory Alan Grimaldo
15-10221Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 14, 2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GREGORY ALAN GRIMALDO,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 15-10221
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00355-GEB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 9, 2015**
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Gregory Alan Grimaldo appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Grimaldo’s counsel has
filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
FILED
DEC 14 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
withdraw as counsel of record. Grimaldo has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and
the government has filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
Grimaldo’s pro se motion for bail pending appeal is DENIED as moot.
AFFIRMED.
15-10221 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.