RUDOLPH DECAMBRA, AKA Anthony Decambra, AKA Rudolph Anthony Decambra, AKA Rudy… v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUDOLPH DECAMBRA, AKA Anthony
Decambra, AKA Rudolph Anthony
Decambra, AKA Rudy Decambra, AKA
Roland James, AKA Andrew Lyon, AKA
Ray Wilson,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-73573
Agency No. A027-251-462
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 9, 2015**
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Rudolph Decambra, a native and citizen of Guyana, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for protection under the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 14 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 13-73573
Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual
findings. Arbid v. Holder, 700 F.3d 379, 385-86 (9th Cir. 2012). We deny the
petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Decambra’s CAT claim
because Decambra failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be
tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to
Guyana. See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2013). We
reject Decambra’s contention that the BIA did not consider Decambra’s news
article or all of the country report.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --