United States of America v. Otoniel Galindo Vasquez- Lopez, a.k.a. Becerro, a.k.a. Yusniel Lopez-Vasquez, a.k.a.…

15-10176Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 23, 2015

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OTONIEL GALINDO VASQUEZ-
LOPEZ, a.k.a. Becerro, a.k.a. Yusniel
Lopez-Vasquez, a.k.a. Galvino Vasquez-
Lopez,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 15-10176
D.C. No. 2:13-cr-01513-GMS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 18, 2015**
Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Otoniel Galindo Vasquez-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment
and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and 174-month sentence for conspiracy
FILED
NOV 23 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), (h), and
concurrent 120-month sentence for conspiracy to transport and harbor illegal
aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), (iii), (v)(I). Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Vasquez-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have provided Vasquez-Lopez the opportunity to file a pro
se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Vasquez-Lopez waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our
independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
15-10176 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.