Marc Nadeau v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARC NADEAU,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-74162
Agency No. A074-773-299
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 14, 2015**
Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Marc Nadeau, a native and citizen of Canada, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s decision denying his application for adjustment of status. We dismiss the
petition for review.
FILED
OCT 20 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of
adjustment of status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (the court lacks jurisdiction
to review any judgment regarding the discretionary denial of relief under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1255). Nadeau’s due process challenges do not constitute colorable
constitutional claims or questions of law that would invoke our jurisdiction. See 8
U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 749 (9th Cir.
2006) (per curiam) (“abuse of discretion challenges to discretionary decisions,
even if recast as due process claims, do not constitute colorable constitutional
claims”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
13-74162 2

-- 2 of 2 --