The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-10459•United States of America v. Juan Elisea-Gonzalez
14-10459Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 19, 2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN ELISEA-GONZALEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10459
D.C. No. 4:11-cr-01998-CKJ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 14, 2015**
Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Juan Elisea-Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 68-month sentence imposed on remand for resentencing. Pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Elisea-Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a
brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
FILED
OCT 19 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
as counsel of record. We have provided Elisea-Gonzalez the opportunity to file a
pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
14-10459 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.