United States of America v. Cyrus D.a. Braswell

14-30014Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSep 1, 2015

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CYRUS D.A. BRASWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-30014
D.C. No. 3:97-cr-00068-JKS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Alaska
James K. Singleton, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 25, 2015**
Before: McKEOWN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Cyrus D.A. Braswell appeals from the district court’s order denying his
motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Braswell’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
FILED
SEP 01 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

record. Braswell has filed pro se supplemental briefs. No answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
14-30014 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.