Robert Critchlow v. KATE E. CRITCHLOW and BARBARA L. WANER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT CRITCHLOW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATE E. CRITCHLOW and BARBARA
L. WANER,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 13-15572
D.C. No. 3:12-cv-01198-LB
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
ORDER
Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed on June 11, 2015, is hereby amended by
deleting the third sentence of the second paragraph, and replacing it with:
“Accordingly, the court’s decision to take judicial notice of these documents
did not convert Kate Critchlow’s and John Waner’s motions to dismiss into
motions for summary judgment.”
With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellant’s
petition for rehearing. Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc
and Judge Schroeder and Judge Nelson so recommended. The petition for
rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no judge requested
a vote for en banc consideration.
FILED
JUL 16 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are
DENIED. The panel will not consider any further petitions for rehearing in
response to the amended memorandum disposition.
2

-- 2 of 2 --