United States of America v. Eduardo Penaloza-Carlon, a.k.a. Eduarto Carlon Penaloza

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDUARDO PENALOZA-CARLON,
a.k.a. Eduarto Carlon Penaloza,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10239
D.C. No. 4:12-cr-00727-JGZ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2015**
Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Eduardo Penaloza-Carlon appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the time-served sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Penaloza-Carlon’s counsel
FILED
APR 28 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Penaloza-Carlon the opportunity
to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief
has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
14-10239 2

-- 2 of 2 --