United States of America v. Cody Ingraham

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CODY INGRAHAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-30199
D.C. No. 6:09-cr-00003-CCL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 7, 2015**
Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Cody Ingraham appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ingraham contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
APR 15 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 14-30199
his history of substance abuse and request for substance abuse treatment. The
district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Ingraham’s sentence. See
Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively
reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of
the circumstances, including Ingraham’s history of violating supervised release and
the need to protect the public. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --