The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-10670•United States of America v. Juan Carlos Arellano- Rodriguez, a.k.a. Juan Carlos Arellano Rodriguez
13-10670Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 5, 2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN CARLOS ARELLANO-
RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Juan Carlos Arellano
Rodriguez,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-10670
D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00822-JGZ-
BPV-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 30, 2014 **
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Juan Carlos Arellano-Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment
and challenges his 41-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
FILED
FEB 05 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
Arellano-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for
relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
Arellano-Rodriguez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. He has
filed a supplemental brief, and the government has filed an answering brief.
Arellano-Rodriguez has waived his right to appeal his 41-month sentence.
Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal
waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88
(9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.