United States of America v. James Frank Berry, a.k.a. James Berry, a.k.a. Jim Berry, a.k.a. Jim F. Berry, a.k.a.…

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES FRANK BERRY, a.k.a. James
Berry, a.k.a. Jim Berry, a.k.a. Jim F. Berry,
a.k.a. Jim Frank Berry, a.k.a. Thomas
Joseph Moran, a.k.a. Alexander Randall,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 12-50380
13-50403
D.C. No. 8:07-cr-00127-DOC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 22, 2014**
Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, James Frank Berry appeals from the district
court’s 2012 judgment revoking supervised release and imposing an 11-month
FILED
JUL 28 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

sentence, and the 2013 judgment revoking supervised release and imposing an 18-
month sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Berry’s
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Berry the opportunity
to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief
has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
12-50380 & 13-50403 2

-- 2 of 2 --