Shuxin Li v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHUXIN LI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-73134
Agency No. A096-364-617
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 11, 2014**
Pasadena, California
Before: FARRIS and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and FRIEDMAN, Senior District
Judge.***
Shuxin Li petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration
Appeals upholding the denial by an immigration judge of Li’s applications for asylum,
FILED
APR 16 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Paul L. Friedman, Senior District Judge for the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition for review.
1. The denial of Li’s asylum application was supported by substantial evidence,
including a forensic document examiner’s testimony that a purported Chinese arrest
notice submitted by Li was prepared on the same printer as documents seized during
a raid of a Los Angeles “document mill.” Substantial evidence also supported the IJ’s
determination that Li’s testimony that his wife mailed the arrest notice to him from
China was not credible.
2. Because Li did not establish eligibility for asylum, his applications for
withholding of removal and CAT protection were also appropriately denied. See
Singh v. INS, 134 F.3d 962, 971 (9th Cir. 1998).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --