The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-70132•Maria G. Navarro-Figueroa v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
10-70132Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 19, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA G. NAVARRO-FIGUEROA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-70132
Agency No. A030-480-098
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted February 6, 2014
Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and COGAN, District
Judge.**
Maria Navarro-Figueroa petitions for review of the decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) finding her removable for having assisted an
FILED
FEB 19 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The Honorable Brian M. Cogan, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
undocumented alien in entering the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(E)(i).
We deny the petition.
Navarro-Figueroa contends that the BIA erred in relying on three I-213
forms and a G-166 report of investigation because those documents contained
statements obtained in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c). Section 287.3(c) provides
that an alien who has been “arrested without warrant and placed in formal
proceedings” must be informed that she has a right to counsel and that statements
she makes may be used against her. Formal proceedings commence with the filing
of a notice to appear in the immigration court. Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder, 558
F.3d 897, 901–02 (9th Cir. 2009). Because Officer Rivera questioned Navarro-
Figueroa before a notice to appear was filed in the immigration court, Navarro-
Figueroa was not entitled to be informed of her rights.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Navarro-
Figueroa affirmatively assisted Beatrice Perez-Ceja in entering the United States in
violation of law. The immigration forms and the testimony of Officer Rivera
indicated that Navarro-Figueroa met with Perez-Ceja in Tijuana and agreed to
drive Perez-Ceja to Los Angeles after she crossed the border, knowing that Perez-
Ceja lacked permission to enter the United States legally.
Petition DENIED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.