United States of America v. Jorge Robles-Retiz, a.k.a. Jorge Robles

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JORGE ROBLES-RETIZ, a.k.a. Jorge
Robles,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-10033
D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01966-ROS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding**
Submitted January 21, 2014***
Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
FILED
JAN 24 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The Honorable Ancer L. Haggerty, Senior United States District
Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.
*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
13-10033

-- 1 of 2 --

Jorge Robles-Retiz appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 36-month sentence for reentry of a
removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Robles-Retiz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are
no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We
have provided Robles-Retiz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Robles-Retiz has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
13-10033 2

-- 2 of 2 --