Julio Cesar Luna-Gutierrez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIO CESAR LUNA-GUTIERREZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-71102
Agency No. A088-169-852
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 17, 2013**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Julio Cesar Luna-Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8
U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo due process claims. Pagayon v. Holder, 675
FILED
DEC 18 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2011) (per curiam). We deny the petition for review.
Luna-Gutierrez contends that the BIA violated due process by accepting the
IJ’s certification of his case after remand. Luna-Gutierrez’s due process claim fails
because he has not indicated what additional evidence he would have submitted on
remand if his case had not been certified back to the BIA. See Lata v. INS, 204
F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (petitioner must show error and prejudice to
establish a due process violation).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
12-71102 2

-- 2 of 2 --