The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-72715•Walter Sigfrido Martinez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
12-72715Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 11, 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALTER SIGFRIDO MARTINEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-72715
Agency No. A070-922-273
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 19, 2013**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Walter Sigfrido Martinez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. We deny the petition for review.
FILED
DEC 11 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
In his opening brief, Martinez fails to raise, and therefore has waived, any
challenge to the BIA’s dispositive determination that his motion to reopen is
untimely and number-barred. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th
Cir. 2011) (issues not raised in a petitioner’s opening brief are deemed waived).
In light of this disposition, we need not reach Martinez’s remaining
contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
12-72715 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.